Вопросы по грамматике в ЕГЭ 2022

[Max9965]

I have a list of questions, concerning grammar tasks, that keep piling up. I think it will be wise to post them here in portions and not one at a time. However, one quetion has been nagging me for a long time. In a nutshell, it is about the use of the past simple tense after the present perfect tense. Example:

Since ancient times women have used lipstick to distinguish themselves among others. They made it out of...

This tense sequence seems natural to me, but sentence 1 is in the past tense in the answers. So, can I speak about the past after mentioning something in the present perfect? The answer is a straight YES in my head, but prepairing for the USE I feel like I'm walking on a mind field. Your help is appreciated!

[Yety]

This tense sequence seems natural to me, but sentence 1 is in the past tense in the answers.

Present perfect doesn't sound wrong in the least here.

can I speak about the past after mentioning something in the present perfect?

Sure.
I thought the question was about the present perfect/past simple in the since-sentence, though.

[VictorB]

Present perfect doesn't sound wrong in the least here.

Yety,
I dare say, Sensei, to me, it does, particularly here, regarding what follows: "They made it out..."
Am I dead wrong again?:-)

An offtopic PS:
The fact is that the first known use of the word lipstick dates from the late 80s of the 19th century. So, earlier than then, women (regardless of what the staff they'd been using for coloring lips was called) could not have been using lipstick.

[Dragon27]

The fact is that the first known use of the word lipstick dates from the late 80s of the 19th century. So, earlier than then, women (regardless of what the staff they'd been using for coloring lips was called) could not have been using lipstick.

People couldn't have used bow and arrow to hunt game until the first use of the words "bow", "arrow", "hunt" and "game"?

[Yety]

to me, it does, particularly here, regarding what follows: "They made it out..."

I can't imagine how that could influence the context so much as to make a present perfect sound wrong in any way. Yet, the context provided is extremely limited, so ...
No, I can't.=)

regardless of what the staff they'd been using for coloring lips was called

That only means one should read this sentence something like that:

Since ancient times women have used WHAT WE NOW CALL 'lipstick' to distinguish themselves among others.

You might want to consider this, too:
https://universal_ru_en.academic.ru/2511305/сигнификат_и_денотат

[VictorB]

People couldn't have used bow and arrow to hunt game until the first use of the words "bow", "arrow", "hunt" and "game"?

LOL! You have me on the ropes here:) I do agree - that was rather dumb a joke (even if I might say that I meant that the lip coloring they wore as make-up, be it made out of crushed gemstones or beeswax and red plant-based dyes, wasn't the lipstick women use now). All I have to say is that by this off-topic remark addressed to Yety I just meant saying hello to him. And I'm more than happy that you didn't miss my comment being that illogical and me that stupid having posted it. I wish we let it just be water going under the bridge. Shall we? :-)

[VictorB]

No, I can't.=)

And what about this:

but sentence 1 is in the past tense in the answers.

?

[GlebNoNePyanykh]

And what about this:

but sentence 1 is in the past tense in the answers.

?

He lied, so you should ask him why he did that.

[Yety]

what about this:
Max9965 пишет: ↑but sentence 1 is in the past tense in the answers.
?

Dunno, Max might have looked up in the wrong key..

[VictorB]

You might want to consider this, too:
https://universal_ru_en.academic.ru/2511305/сигнификат_и_денотат

If it means lipstick with the meaning of lip coloring make-up going through the ages or with that of swivel-up lipstick tubes we know now, I've taken note of the difference, thanks :)

[Max9965]

Эта тема в Вербицкой взорвала мне мозг. Вот какую проблему вы увидите в этой диаграмме и пути ее разрешения? Только не обманывайте. Ведь на это задание дается только 20 минут.

[Juliemiracle]

Max9965,
например, что семейные ценности в заднице - все только и мечтают делать карьеру и учиться :)
Или что очень непоследовательный подход: с одной стороны мы вроде карьеру хотим, но с другой стороны, совсем не думаем о получении прибыли с карьерного продвижения. Мы типа только ради удовлетворения тщеславия стремимся к покорению карьерной лестницы?

[Juliemiracle]

Max9965,
о, еще ж решения.
Ну, по первому пункту - пропагандировать семейные ценности больше, наверное :)
По второму, какой-нибудь коучинг организовать для молодежи или career counselling, чтобы у них типа мечты были более down-to-earth и позитивно влияющими на well-being мечатющего :)

[Max9965]

Max9965,
о, еще ж решения.
Ну, по первому пункту - пропагандировать семейные ценности больше, наверное :)
По второму, какой-нибудь коучинг организовать для молодежи или career counselling, чтобы у них типа мечты были более down-to-earth и позитивно влияющими на well-being мечатющего :)

Клевые слова. Мне бы такие вспомнить на сочинении :) Единственное, что я родил было в стиле "тинейджеры должны мечтать в первую очередь о сеймейных ценностях, ведь всё, что мы делаем, направлено на продолжение своего рода". Решения не придумал. Но, наверное, было бы что-то в духе: "организовать тоталитарное гос-во"

[Juliemiracle]

Решения не придумал. Но, наверное, было бы что-то в духе: "организовать тоталитарное гос-во"

:)))
Предлагаю начать с социальной рекламы и фин. поддержки семей.