Вопрос про of и проценты.

Обсуждение вопросов, нюансов и тонкостей грамматики английского языка любого уровня.

Модератор: zymbronia

kirill77786
Сообщения: 19
Зарегистрирован: 23 сен 2019, 08:08
Благодарил (а): 31 раз

#1

Сообщение kirill77786 »

Здравствуйте! Разъясните пожалуйста последнюю часть этого предложения. В каком значении находится предлог "of" в сочетании с "which", если в значении "в", то почему? Почему именно такая последовательность "institutions 75 percent", а не 75 percent of institutions?

"The survey was compiled by Dr Tim Cook of Kingston Polytechnic for the standing Conference of English in Polytechnics and Colleges of Higher Education, of which institutions 75 percent took part."
Аватара пользователя
Yety
Сообщения: 11163
Зарегистрирован: 28 фев 2018, 23:44
Благодарил (а): 3371 раз
Поблагодарили: 5387 раз

#2

Сообщение Yety »

kirill77786 пишет: 01 окт 2019, 11:48 of which institutions 75 percent took part
"из которых заведений (=заведений, из которых) приняли участие 75%"
канцелярит какой-то
mustang
Сообщения: 6070
Зарегистрирован: 23 май 2018, 06:17
Благодарил (а): 926 раз
Поблагодарили: 2040 раз

#3

Сообщение mustang »

Криво написано, как будто пьяным носителем или иностранцем. Надо: 75% of which took part in the survey (experiment), whatever.
Аватара пользователя
Yety
Сообщения: 11163
Зарегистрирован: 28 фев 2018, 23:44
Благодарил (а): 3371 раз
Поблагодарили: 5387 раз

#4

Сообщение Yety »

Не из любопрения.
Так действительно лучше:
Recent research estimates humans have produced 6,300 metric tons of waste since 1950, only 9 percent of which has been recycled.
EyeMed offers several plan options, including EyeMed Healthy, EyeMed Bold and EyeMed Bright, the latter of which is the insurer’s family plan.
The EyeMed Healthy plan has good benefits, the best of which is a $0 copay on an eye exam.
Humana has good benefits, the most attractive of which is a $10 copay on your annual eye exam
Но и вариант institutions, of which 75% took part не кажется сколько-нибудь неgrammотным или intoxicated:
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United NationsПоказать
The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2018 - Meeting the sustainable development goals пишет:Total fish production in 2016 reached an all-time high of 171 million tonnes, of which 88 percent was utilized for direct human consumption,
The total first sale value of fisheries and aquaculture production in 2016 was estimated at USD 362 billion, of which USD 232 billion was from aquaculture production.
However, this rebound can be attributed to China’s catches of marine fishes nei in area 61, the Northwest Pacific, of which a good portion, as explained above, are distant-water catches that include fish caught in other areas.
By 2013 some 9 200 people were part of the lobster fishery in this part of Nicaragua, of which 2 390 were dive fishers.
... by 2011, 1 100 divers had been affected by hyperbaric diseases, of which 528 had severe disability (INPESCA, 2011).
Очень даже трезвые канцелярские крысы клерки из UN.
За это сообщение автора Yety поблагодарил:
kirill77786
tourist
Сообщения: 1765
Зарегистрирован: 04 мар 2018, 21:25
Благодарил (а): 249 раз
Поблагодарили: 865 раз

#5

Сообщение tourist »

...171 million tonnes, of which 88 percent was
...362 billion, of which USD 232 billion was
...diseases, of which 528 had
these do not exactly follow the same pattern as in:
of which institutions 75 percent took part
inclusion of institutions makes a big difference IM(not so)HO
it may not amount to being intoxicated, but still ... железом по стеклу.
Не из любопрения
never heard the word, but it's very descriptive in many cases,
not this one, though.
Аватара пользователя
Yety
Сообщения: 11163
Зарегистрирован: 28 фев 2018, 23:44
Благодарил (а): 3371 раз
Поблагодарили: 5387 раз

#6

Сообщение Yety »

Речь уже шла о варианте:
Yety пишет: 02 окт 2019, 12:30 institutions, of which 75% took part
который противопоставлялся тому, который надо:
75% of which took part in the survey (experiment), whatever.
never heard the word, but it's very descriptive in many cases,
not this one, though.
There're probably some more of them, unheard of: дмение, любоначалие, любобранный, гордомудрый, смиренномудрый,...
some of which can also be very descriptive in many cases.
Последний раз редактировалось JamesTheBond 03 окт 2019, 12:06, всего редактировалось 1 раз.
Причина: Исправлено по просьбе автора
Ответить
  • Похожие темы
    Ответы
    Просмотры
    Последнее сообщение

Вернуться в «Грамматика»